HED Church or Synagogue?

    Harmony - Empathy - Destiny*         

Juno  2009      

Newsletter of the Church of the Fourth Manifestation

P O Box 152 Geebung 4034 Australia            acfalange@yahoo.com.au        

HED is published in the Public Interest. CFM accept no liability for actions taken.  Opinions remain those of the author.  

CHURCH OR SYNAGOGUE?                              

 By Gudrun Heidegger

CHURCH OR SYNAGOGUE? One reason many Rightists reject a role for Christian Church in saving White Race is they see Church as ‘a tool of Enemy’. To explain the interrelationship of the Enemy and the Church we must look to the Bible's Old Testament. Enemy's greatest ruler was King David. He expanded their borders to their largest area, bringing neighbour-ing states into tributary (‘client state’) status. When the Enemy's land was conquered by first the Greeks then the Romans they sought a new ’David’ to free them. To this end they evolved a theocratic state, i.e. rule by priests.

IRAN: Similar situation exists in Iran today. Ancient Israel had no separation of ‘Church and State’. Church leaders were simultaneously State’s rulers. Was not till the rise of the American revolutionaries and their French counterparts in 1776 and 1789 that the idea of a ‘separation of church & state’ was popularised by the atheistic radical leaders of both ‘revolutions'.

MESSIANIC RULE: Back to Enemy. When a contender arrived, Jesus of Nazareth, rabbis (religious/secular rulers) expected Him to assume control as their long-promised King. He refused so they rejected Him, had Him arrested by the occupying Romans and executed. Why did He reject Kingly rule as a new David? He had bigger plans than simply to be ruler of one obscure and insignificant province of Rome’s Empire. As ‘Suffering Servant’ (predicted in Isaiah 53) and then resurrected Lord He now rules a Church numbering in billions that embraces every race, nation, people & language. Unimaginable if He had restricted Himself to being merely a minor Davidic king.

HISTORIC RIVALRY: But this move beyond the nationalistic, ethnic roots of Israel out into 'Gentile’ (non-Jewish) world set up a rivalry which continues 2,000 years later. Which vehicle does God use to expose His will to an unbelieving world and which does He use as His means of exacting Judgment? The Jews nation-state soon fell to the Romans in both AD 70 and AD 135 after failed revolts but now spread throughout the Empire the Jews continued, and still do, to oppose what they see as usurpers - The Church. Complicating things, Christians are called to 'honour' the Jews and to study their Old Testament with equal gravity as they do their own New Testament.

HONOUR THOSE WHO HATE THEM? Also tenor of Old and New are often opposites. Leads to the dilemma of the Church. In most of its time since the death of Christ the Church has been ’militant’ and ’triumphant’ I.e. proud of its role as God‘s vehicle for bringing His Word of repentance and renewal to all human relations and every nation. But the previous group still remain. Jesus spoke of the need for “new wine to go into new wineskins. If new wine goes into old skins they will burst and the wine will be wasted“ (Luke 5 v 37-39). But is the eternal rivalry of these two groups productive?

TWO BETTER THAN ONE: What many Rightists, and many Christians, fail to see is God can use this rivalry. An old expression is ‘iron sharpens iron’. The idea that two bitter rivals can produce something greater than they could by cooperation. Would Germany have produced rockets, missiles and jet fighters, a level of technical innovation that finally lead men to the Moon in 1969, if not for the conflict with the Allies in WWII? 

ARABS PROMPT PUSH TO 'NEW WORLD': In 1453 AD Muslims conquered Byzantium (Eastern Roman Empire) cutting 'Silk Road’ of trade between China and Western Europe. Europe desired silk. So in 1492 AD Christopher Colombus was sent to find an alternative rout to the East using a new theory of his - that the world was round. By heading West he hoped to arrive in the East. When he did not find Japan and China he supposed natives looked liked 'Indians' so called them such. Is how we have West 'Indians' today. How does this relate to the Jew/Christian rivalry?

TIME FOR RESURGENCE: during past 2,000 years Church has seen many Ages. Since 1850’s rise of both Darwinism (theory of evolution) and Marxism (theory of class struggle as motive force in History) Church has been on defensive. Did not crush these atheistic foes. Allowed rise of Socialism which in 20th century caused death of 120 million worldwide. Church tries to defend itself by compromise with its enemies. Has failed. Time now for attack. No longer a church in ‘laager’, we need a church of assassins. No more 'turning the other cheek'. Jesus gave this advice but did not heed it Himself, nor did apostle Paul.

GOD OF CHANGE: To many Christians this sounds like heresy. Have been raised for past 100 years on ’gentle Jesus meek and mild’. Only options shown were 'babe in a manger' at Christ-Mass and 'thief nailed to a cross' at Oester. In both cases, the God-man is impotent and helpless. Is it any wonder He's not feared by our foes? Early Church, desperate for recruits, accepted run-away slaves, crippled beggars, woman and outcast. In 313 AD Christians took control of the dying Roman Empire. Church purists rejected this as 'worldly', many fleeing to desert monasteries. Any wonder those with money and power took power but eschew the 'real' Church? Embrace of weak but rejection of  the strong made the current state of the church inevitable.    

GOD OF OPPOSITES: Major difficulty both Jews and Church have with Yah-God is they want to ‘put Him in a box’ i.e. restrict Yah to familiar patterns of behaviour and communication. Jews thought they had God 'in a box' when they built Jerusalem Temple. A big box but Jesus predicted it would be ‘destroyed in three days and rebuilt’. Was one of the charges against Him at His Sanhedrin trial. So what is God like? Both Old & New Testaments describes Yah, Jesus' Father, as God of Justice AND Mercy. Jews prefer God of Justice, so use His laws for their everyday society.

RESTORING THE BALANCE: Jesus over-emphasised the Mercy aspect so rendered Law null. Forced Church to adopt whatever laws it found in whatever society it infiltrated, worldwide. In the West today we see the Church accept suicidal rulings by debased and depraved ‘judges’ and lawyers. Church cut itself off from Law; is now a hostage to social 'trends'. Is NOT what God planned or wants. We seek to redress this imbalance: re-emphasise God’s Law. Islam has Sharia Law; Jews have Talmud. We need our own 'Law'. Good start would be Catholic Canon Law. Would show God's dual aspects, Mercy AND Judgment, not just one or other.

CFM accept no responsibility for information provided/inferred. Is an information source only. All opinions remain those of the author.